Tuesday, October 6, 2009

06/10/2009

Spent morning researching artists for crit; Rirkrit Tiravanija, Liam Gillick, Phillip Parreno, . Writers Nicolas Bourriaud; Relational Aesthetice, and Alter Modern.
P.M we had critique, very interesting and informative, these crits are a great way for expanding the knowledge base for art practice.

Monday, October 5, 2009

05/10/2009 Contd.


Again, as a reference to different ways of displaying artworks, the wooden figure has been placed on a round window.




05/10/2009 Contd.

                                         Reflection.




Reality

05/10/2009 Contd.





05/10/2009

The Force was strong with this one today ! My creative juices were overflowing (TG). Got my shaped mirrors from the glass man today,(I am glad I did not hit off him, just in case he broke. LOL)  they have turned out well. I stuck them up in the seminar room. I am not 100% certain if the glue will stick it to the wall, so I have used some little pieces of the metal repair tape as an extra precaution. I have used the mirror in this painting, in terms of a relational aesthetic, that is, I have taken it out of its' original context for use as an actual artwork; whatever is in the reflection of the mirror, is a part of the artwork, so in some sense, it is also an interactive piece; you view the artwork, you become a part of the artwork, so no two viewings of the artwork are ever the same. (could we argue then, that it is the same for every artwork in terms of a unique perspective; different size and shape of shadows and so forth ?) (The mirror proves my argument) I took some photos in the reflection of the mirror (nothing unique there) and then from roughly the same position in reality. The mirrored photograph came out back to front, which leads me to ask the question; if indeed my eyes are made to deceive me, then how shall I ever know what is real? (Quote from Richard, whilst in second year painting. A reference to how our eyes perceive the outside world upside down, and our brain turns it the right? way up.) I am intrigued by mirrors, and as I said in earlier posts, I will be using them in a number of different ways in my studio practice.

02/10/2009





Ordered the shaped mirrors today, the guy at the glass works caught me off guard, and asked me which way around I wanted the mirror. It actually never occurred to me of the difference between the opposite side of the mirrors. Fair play to him for thinking about it. Before I had taken down the boards, I had gone around the shape of them with a pencil, just to be sure of the position of them when putting them back up. The thought occurred to me that I actually quite liked the marks left, and went over the marks with some black marker.  I replaced the wooden man back to his original position, and 'dripped' the paint down the wall again. In some sense, it was a surreal scenario; where once the space of creativity had been, it was now devoid of these items, however, the marks, and the re positioning of the figure, has turned it in to another artwork. It raises questions in terms of the display place of an art work. For example, do the creative energies of an artwork attach itself to the space in which it once hung? if so, could this be reason enough to leave an area blank that once housed artworks? Another question which needs to asked then, is, if this is the case where there is a residual creative energy left in a gallery, or on a wall where once an artwork was, could this ultimately have an effect on any further artworks displayed in the same space? These are indeed valid questions, which I believe are worthy of further investigations.

01/10/2009


Had a tutorial with CCS tutor David yesterday, I have mentioned to him that I have changed direction from my original first chapter, he said it usually happens, so it is not a problem. Wrote e mail to my personal tutor Mark, regarding the tutorial. A colleague has lent me one of the books that Mark has suggested I read, it is Relational Aesthetics by Nicolas Bourriaud. While the language can be somewhat over complicated at times, (perhaps this because of the translation from French to English) I understand the concepts of which he speaks, and find it very interesting and thought provoking. Along with other books by the same author, 'postproduction' and 'Alter Modern' I appear have found a Classification for my kind of artwork.I ordered some of the other books from the library today as well.